Canada: Good riddance to long gun registry

Articles and Essays from other websites, of interest to our members.

Moderator: GenMod

Canada: Good riddance to long gun registry

Postby GOSA » Thu, 2009-11-19 16:00

http://www.torontosun.com/news/columnis ... 6-sun.html


Good riddance to long gun registry


By PETER WORTHINGTON


Now that MPs have voted 164-137 to repeal the registry of long guns and
shotguns, several realities stand out in the whole emotional question of
the gun registry.


For starters, gun registration has cut down on neither crime nor gun
violence -- and forget the support given the program by the Canadian
Association of Chiefs of Police. Try asking individual cops, and you get a
different, non-political answer.


The idea that police rely on the registry in the detection of crime, makes
no sense. When you get down to it, no one has an accurate idea of how many
guns there are in Canada, or who owns them.


Officially, three million Canadians own seven million guns. (The Toronto
Star's editorial board thinks two million are gun owners). Two or three
million gun owners in a population of 33 million? Who is kidding whom?


In the mid-1970s, when gun registration was barely hinted at and Canada's
population was under 25 million, it was estimated that seven million
Canadians owned 21 million firearms. How come such a discrepancy, when our
population has grown by 25% from those days?


The answer is that there are literally millions of unregistered hunting
rifles and shotguns out there that Canadians haven't registered and aren't
declaring -- and aren't using to commit crimes.


If you accept this -- and how can you not, if you check the record -- the
gun registry is little but an expensive, unnecessary, largely useless waste
of time. Bureaucratic boondoggle aptly describes the program.


NO REASON TO KEEP IT


The Toronto Star editorially supports gun registration, arguing the
Conservatives "have no valid reason to kill off Canada's rifle and shotgun
registry . . . ." On the contrary, there is no valid reason to keep it --
especially when many Canadians are probably ignoring the law. Besides, as a
Private Members Bill -- C-139, courtesy of Tory MP Candice Hoeppner
(Portage-Lisgar) -- it became easier for party leaders to okay a free vote.
Something of a mercy killing of the gun registry.


Repealing the registry has no effect on hand gun registration and control,
which has been in effect since 1934. Hand guns are still the weapon of
choice for crime and murder.


ALL UNNECESSARY


The repeal applies only to shotguns and rifles -- bolt action or
semi-automatic. It does not apply to assault weapons, machine guns,
grenades and fully automatic rifles -- all unnecessary and for the most
part illegal.


We are not the U.S., where 50% of the population own an estimated 270
million firearms -- 90 guns for every 100 people.


In the trivia department, there are roughly 210 million cars in the U.S.,
and every year some 46,000 people die in traffic accidents, while 30,000
are killed annually by guns -- homicides, suicides, accidental shootings
combined.


Although the U.S. has more firearms than any other country, Switzerland
(population 7.5 million) has more firepower per citizen that any country on
earth. Yet it is one of the safest, most law-abiding of countries. By law,
every male must own a weapon -- a well-armed population is the country's
main line of defence.


To assume that firearms lead to crime and violence is wrong. Not in
Switzerland, not in Canada. Eliminating the long gun registry in Canada
will be trimming bureaucracy and freeing up money to be wasted in some
other way.
What have YOU done for YOUR rights today?
GOSA
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1598
Joined: Sun, 2006-01-29 15:42
Location: South Africa

Return to From all over

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron